Category: Blog of Damien S. Riley

Although the clown monster hit “It” of the same year may have ended up grossing more box office dollars, “Pet Sematary” is a much better horror movie written by Stephen King, in my opinion. The creepiness permeates and paves the way for a quaint yet terrifying tale of one family and a mystic pet cemetery just behind their house.

Full post and recording at: 

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

New Podcast Film Review! I talk about the Godzilla film “Plus” mini reviews of Gremlins 2, Fire in the Sky, The Girl in the Spiderweb, Infliction, The Car, Bubba Ho-Tep, Eden Log, & Testament.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

My podcast review of this visionary horror film.

Transcript auto generated

please listen carefully
this is my review of in fabric I’m so
glad I’m so glad I finally saw this
movie I’ve been wanting to see it for
several years I want to say this goes
back as far as 2014 I’m not sure and I
don’t see the date in front of me but oh
2018 so it doesn’t quite go that far
back
I think us old guys we reach a certain
age and we just think
we’re not old
and some of us are more than others I
guess I like to think I’m young at heart
but anyway this was 2018 which was
really not that long ago but
the reason I thought of 2014 is what is
my ultimate Arbiter of where I am in the
universe when I saw Tusk that’s right I
saw a desk 2014. but we’re not talking
about tests we’re talking about in
fabric
directed by Peter Strickland who
apparently has made a name for himself
this film is the different it’s like
people have called it Lynch meets Dario
Argento yeah there are moments like that
it definitely is simplified which I like
a lot
for example I was just watching last
night in SoHo yesterday and a bunch of
friends were telling me that it was so
good my friend Charlie Ray was telling
me it was so good and it was pretty good
it was better than I
had prejudiced about it because I when I
saw them doing the dancing with the
finger dancing in the 60s and all that
the fingers on the eyes and stuff I was
like no thank you don’t really want to
watch a whole movie of this and baby
driver was kind of like that so the
director kind of does that and I guess
for me that was kind of a hangout
everybody has Hang-Ups right you have
something you can’t get Beyond
for some people it’s an actor
for a lot of years I didn’t really like
Jon Voight but I forced myself to watch
his movies and I just ignored that I
didn’t really like him as a private
person
and I love him as an actor so it can
happen he just gotta look at yourself as
an artiste and an appreciate excuse my
language today I appreciate her I don’t
mind my tongue there I am appreciator of
movies and I hope you are and I know
most people who listen to this are so I
would just say hey
couple things actually I figured
something else out too
if you
look at this movie
you’re gonna find something quite
different than what you probably suspect
so do not be prejudiced toward this
movie do not be prejudiced toward any
movie
but especially those of you that don’t
just hang on the latest greatest four
out of ten
film for high school kids drinking beer
which maybe some of you are like that I
have a few in that age range that listen
at least they used to hopefully they
still do hello out there
the point is there’s a lot to be
prejudicent about with this movie and I
can’t tell them today for some reason I
need to get myself a nice route here
but before I do that
please see this movie it’s excellent
you’re gonna find a lot of creepy things
going on that you’re not really going to
understand you’re going to see a lot of
things that
I think come from like sort of the Blade
Runner time when films were being made
at that time there’s like a lot of that
kind of a feeling there’s a kind of a
fee — Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Yeah just that

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

This film succeeded with me in presenting a background in front of which I can see a personal connection. It failed a little in preaching what the background would do for the close up characters, who we are invested in, maybe too much.

It’s safe to say this guy’s films are spoiled from their release. Even the title here carries a summary. Through peripheral unintentional spoils, I knew it was about people on a beach who either get old or discover people there who got old prematurely. Without spoilers, there’s something undefinable on the island and the film does have to do with that process.

I’m a high achiever so I know people will vary in their reactions to growing old. I would have drawn conclusions for characters that hadn’t been clearly lined out in the film. Why is the best ending _______? I like a more open ended film when it comes to It’s a Wonderful Life conclusions. Maybe he doesn’t want her back? As an example? 

In conclusion, if you are introspective about life, this could be a good place to go. Don’t look for moral truths but use your imagination to marinate the troubles and mixed blessings in your life. For introspective fans of M Night Shyamalan, I recommend “Old” to you.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Helen McCrory fans like myself were likely shocked and excited that the lovely actress was to play a female Dr. Frankenstein.

We know this only from the title however since her name is not mentioned as such. Along with the change of gender, this “incarnation” of the mythic monster film is highly protean. The things I liked best about it were: 1) The persona of a mother to the being, 2) The hideous yet credible creature, and 3) the veer away from reanimation in place of creation at a cellular level, like cloning it would seem.

You could correctly say that there is a motherly-like connection between Frankenstein, the novel monster, and his scientific creator. For that reason, this aspect is not a stretch. Still, it’s developed so well the horror is palpable and relatable to any parent. Every parent can relate with the situation in which the Dr. attempts to bring her child back to life. This film is supposedly modern so it doesn’t have the ghoulish charm of the old ones. At the same time, this scenario of the doctor as a mother to the monster speaks new volumes we could talk about. I recommend it on that aspect alone but there are other great attributes of this film.

The second thing to love about this film is the creature. It looks scary. There are shots where he’s moving where you can really believe the actor looks like that. If you’ve seen Tobe Hooper’s “Funhouse” film, you might compare the two creatures. What’s weird about it is it formed through cellular division and mutation as opposed to the Dr. digging up a corpse and reanimating it. In the tender shots with mom, the eyes are quite expressive. I have to admit I didn’t expect such a well formed creature in a BBC movie. I was wrong, it’s insanely cool looking. For the third thing, I want to share further about the angle of the film regarding cellular fusion and cloning.

Have you ever seen the “Dolly” lamb that was cloned? It’s creepy as all get up. The idea of a living thing that was born in a lab to me is terrifying. In the same breath I will say however it’s fascinating from a scientific perspective. It would have been cool to see the traditional path of these movies run its course but they made something new work. The more modern movies do that and as a result many have been made and have held the public’s full attention and praise. There is a sequence of images of amoebas and paramecium under the microscope. I loved that so much. The idea that life is relentless and will fight to live and even evolve.

In conclusion I highly recommend this film. It’s streaming now on Amazon Prime. I hope you’ll subscribe to my podcast and blog to get the latest monster movie I review in this series.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Art mimics life and sometimes it’s so flawlessly done in film that it explains the news of the day. In this case. I’m referring to racism as portrayed in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

Today we are hearing evidence of Republicans mistreating migrants. Governor Abbot had them bussed to Chicago in a defiant act against President Biden. I recall the scenes in Mockingbird where Mayella recounts for the court how she as supposedly raped by a crippled arm black man. I will say in the same paragraph however that I am not assaulting Republicanism as a group (though it is going that way dear friends. I’m astounded how low they have sunken under Trump’s dictatorship.

We find out quickly this rape could not have happened and it opens’ our eyes to the dehumanization of blacks in the 1930’s. You’d think we would have stopped this’s hurtful nonsense after all these years. Trump’s mug juts out at all of us reminding how we deserve more than another race. This is a lousy way to deal with “The Other” among us. He has grabby hands.

I think this film has replaced “A River Runs Through it” as my all time favorite. Every semester I teach entering Freshmen about respect for the “Other.” You see this perfectly embodied in the character played by Greg Peck, Atticus Finch. That’s the only comparison I will allude to regarding Republicans. If you are one, I hope you don’t get offended but rather heed the call to be better. I used to be a Republican, I shy away from that fact now.

The court scenes show a white man who has empathy for the Other in his awareness’ for the Other, who is a black man, his client, The film is charming because it paints a timely portrait of the South. The genius mind of Harper Lee has created a place on film where we all can go to address these issues. We’re all guilty of racial bias, I truly believe that. Some more than others can rise above. I can give this film no less than 10/10. Watch it, especially if you are a MAGA Republican. Let me know what you think in the comments.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Can I call this charming? A friend who is mentally disabled is cute in a way. We have the protagonist, the monster, We se the monster in this early incarnation desiring a friend. The mad scientist has grand plans. We get to see the monster develop language. We also ss he is sort of capable of making another human happy. I’m thinking of the blind man who gives him food and shelter to heal. In this epic blockbuster horror film, we see a human undead monster and he’s still got the drives for companionship.</p>It has the usual mob trying to kill the monster. Through this exciting segment of about 1/2 way we see him as a flawed, even brain damaged human. I couldn’t help but feel sorrow for the monster. Bela Lugosi is a prefect actor for this human creature (or is it?). Some of my favorite scenes are the ones with the blind man. They are kindred spirits in that each wants a friend. I got the impression one would get watching a toddler find something shiny and becoming enraptured with it.

Putting the monster through torture is what had me glued to the screen. I’m not into torture but I find myself relating with the yearning, longing, and even lusting after a woman or otherwise partner. They are such fine and wonderful creatures those partners. I also related with the block of communication that is present throughout. Did you know the Bible teaches the Tower of Babel was why God confused language for all humankind. It tried to be higher than God so God humbled them. The monster illustrates how horrible it would be to not be able to communicate.

There are not many scenes of the actual author Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. The film however does open with she and Lord Byron commenting on the lovely ghastly storm outside. We see clearly based on the title and the plot, she is to be made into a female monster, for the creature. I love the way they weaved the real life couple into this. Is raises the verisimilitude and leaves us actually wanting to see them together.

Unfortunately we don’t see much of the female. The latter portion of the film is where we see only her transformation but not much detail. She looks just plain freaky, I like that. I get from her character that she too is unable to communicate. She is quicker moving than the monster.

<p>In conclusion, this is to date one of my favorite classic series films. I really enjoy the writing, especially the writing of Byron and Shelley, The film is a delightful hodgepodge of suspenseful orchestra music and top shelf acting. The result is a mind ride to understand why we should never bring the dead back to life. This is an incredibly atmospheric class A horror film. I can give it no lower than a 10/10.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Bunch of malarkey. Book is best. “Then the white coats were all gathered around the cot, and you couldn’t seethe  kid  anymore.  Directly  behind  him,  a  chart  hung  down.  It  showed  thequadrants of the human brain. Andy looked at this with great interest for awhile. Verrry in-der-rresting, as Arte Johnson said on Laugh-In.A bloody hand rose out of the huddle of white coats, like the hand of adrowning man. The ngers were streaked with gore and shreds of tissue hungfrom them. The hand smacked the chart, leaving a bloodstain in the shape of alarge comma. The chart rattled up on its roller with a smacking sound.” Stephen King, Firestarter

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message

Laboratory minimal.

—

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/damien-riley/message